Why ESG Ratings Disagree — and What Independent Data Shows
ESG rating providers give the same company wildly different scores. We looked at what court filings and regulators say instead.
Research archive
Investigations into emissions, pollution, energy and environmental claims.
Page 2 of 2
ESG rating providers give the same company wildly different scores. We looked at what court filings and regulators say instead.
An ethical-sounding fund name is not an answer. To understand a portfolio, you need to inspect its actual holdings, decide which issues matter to you and read the evidence behind each company's record.
ESG ratings agencies rely on self-reported data, compress multidimensional conduct into a single grade, and get paid by the companies they evaluate. The result is a system that rewards disclosure over behaviour.
AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud dominate the digital economy. We scored Amazon, Microsoft, and Alphabet on environmental impact using court filings, regulatory data, and investigative reports -- not corporate sustainability PDFs.
Compare environmental scores for mining and related companies. See the leaders, laggards, dated evidence and limits behind sustainable-mining claims.
We scored the 26 most common holdings in popular ESG ETFs across 11 independent dimensions. 17 of 26 have a negative average score.
Compare 10 companies using verified Mashinii score records, with missing dimensions shown separately and links to each company’s evidence.
We scored three of the world's largest oil companies on ethical integrity using court filings, regulatory actions, and investigative reports. Here is what the data shows.
Compare 11 green-energy companies on ethics, including First Solar, Ørsted and ITM Power. See score coverage, evidence and limits for investors.
Why the prosperity vs. planet debate misses the point entirely.
The Evidence Brief