The Worst Companies for the Environment in 2026 (Scored)
The lowest scorers on our Planet-Friendly Business value, ranked by regulatory enforcement, emissions records and investigative reporting rather than self-reported sustainability claims.
Research archive
Investigations into emissions, pollution, energy and environmental claims.
Page 1 of 2
The lowest scorers on our Planet-Friendly Business value, ranked by regulatory enforcement, emissions records and investigative reporting rather than self-reported sustainability claims.
We score Delta, United and American across eleven values. Delta leads on integrity, American trails on pay, and all three share the same environmental and data problems.
Chipotle's current sustainability and ethics record across climate, labour, animal welfare, waste and food safety.
Starbucks' current record on worker rights, coffee sourcing, waste, climate and animal welfare, supported by direct sources.
Both chains paid billions in opioid settlements and score positive on health access yet negative on business conduct. We compare CVS and Walgreens across eleven values.
Coca-Cola scores negative or zero on every value we measure. Here is what the public record says about plastic, water, sugar, and labour.
91% of companies score negative on Planet-Friendly Business. If you hold an index fund, your portfolio almost certainly reflects that.
Both EV darlings market themselves as the green choice. Both score negative overall. Tesla's worst is fair pay. Rivian's worst is honesty.
Glencore has bribery convictions, environmental violations, and one of the worst scores in our database. It still appears in ESG-labelled funds.
Planet-Friendly Business is the worst-performing value in our database. Out of 6,035 companies with non-zero scores, 5,507 are negative. We looked at who passes.
We scored the top 10 holdings of the most popular ESG ETFs across 11 integrity dimensions using court filings, regulatory penalties, and investigative journalism. Only two of the 10 companies score net positive. The average is -13.6.
We compared ESG ratings from MSCI and Sustainalytics against court filings, regulatory penalties, and investigative journalism for six of the world's largest companies. The gap between ESG ratings and documented conduct is measurable, and it affects how portfolios are constructed.
We scored the top holdings of major ESG funds across 11 ethical dimensions using court filings, regulatory penalties, and investigative journalism. Every single one scored negative on multiple dimensions.
Compare 5 companies using verified Mashinii score records, with missing dimensions shown separately and links to each company’s evidence.
Warren Buffett's conglomerate has 255 environment-related offenses, coal plants linked to 260 premature deaths annually, and a subsidiary that settled for $24.4 million over racial discrimination in lending.
BlackRock's support for ESG shareholder proposals fell from 47% to 4%. Goldman Sachs financed $184.9 billion in fossil fuels while being operationally carbon neutral since 2015. Shell's total emissions in 2024 were 1.2 billion metric tonnes. We scored eight companies that went quiet on sustainability.
TotalEnergies does not report Scope 3 emissions. Ryanair's environmental ad was banned by the UK ASA. Volkswagen's defeat devices contributed to approximately 1,200 premature deaths in Europe. We scored eight major European companies on what the evidence shows.
A practical checklist for testing green and ethical investment claims against holdings, exclusions, evidence and regulatory guidance.
We checked the top holdings of popular ESG funds against independent data. The labels don't always match the evidence.
The FCA now requires sustainability claims to be fair, clear, and not misleading. Here's what that means for investment recommendations.
ESG rating providers give the same company wildly different scores. We looked at what court filings and regulators say instead.
An ethical-sounding fund name is not an answer. To understand a portfolio, you need to inspect its actual holdings, decide which issues matter to you and read the evidence behind each company's record.
ESG ratings agencies rely on self-reported data, compress multidimensional conduct into a single grade, and get paid by the companies they evaluate. The result is a system that rewards disclosure over behaviour.
AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud dominate the digital economy. We scored Amazon, Microsoft, and Alphabet on environmental impact using court filings, regulatory data, and investigative reports -- not corporate sustainability PDFs.
The Evidence Brief