The Starbucks Boycott, Explained: What the Evidence Shows (2026)
Calls to boycott Starbucks span its union conflict, store closures, and coffee sourcing. We separate documented record from contested narrative, with verified value scores.
Research archive
Research on pay, labour rights, working conditions and ethical sourcing.
Page 1 of 1
Calls to boycott Starbucks span its union conflict, store closures, and coffee sourcing. We separate documented record from contested narrative, with verified value scores.
We scored the major listed clothing companies on independent evidence. The uncomfortable finding: none rank highly, and 'ethical clothing brand' remains mostly a marketing claim.
Lululemon and Nike both sell premium activewear and both carry negative records on labour and the environment. We compare the evidence value by value.
Chipotle's current sustainability and ethics record across climate, labour, animal welfare, waste and food safety.
Starbucks markets itself as a leader in ethical sourcing and worker care. The audited record tells a more complicated story, with the sharpest gap in its coffee supply chain.
Starbucks' current record on worker rights, coffee sourcing, waste, climate and animal welfare, supported by direct sources.
Apple scores well on environment and privacy but poorly on labour and business conduct. We score the company across 11 values, with the evidence behind each.
From Domino's to Goldman Sachs, these companies score lowest on how they treat workers. Ranked by data from court filings and regulatory actions.
Nestlé has faced a boycott for nearly five decades, a US Supreme Court case over cocoa child labor, and a leaked admission that most of its food is not healthy. Mashinii scores the record on 11 values.
Shein scores negative on all nine dimensions Mashinii evaluates. Temu's parent PDD Holdings looks cleaner on paper, but most of its zeros reflect thinner verified evidence, not better conduct. Here is what the record actually shows.
Tesla scores positively on waste and community impact, negatively on labor and honesty. Bloomberg counts 59 robotaxis against a promise to serve half the US. The evidence cuts both ways.
Christian Dior's current ethics record across animal welfare, luxury supply chains, worker treatment, waste and climate.
We scored H&M, Zara, Gap, Primark, Nike, and Lululemon across labor, environment, waste, and supply chain ethics using court filings, investigative reports, and NGO data. The results are not encouraging.
We scored nine of the world's most recognizable consumer brands across 11 ethical dimensions using court filings, NGO reports, and investigative journalism. Not one scored positive overall.
Both Uber and Lyft dominate ride-hailing, but their ethical records diverge sharply on worker treatment, data privacy, and environmental impact. Mashinii's integrity scores break down who performs worse -- and why neither earns a passing grade.
Compare 5 companies using verified Mashinii score records, with missing dimensions shown separately and links to each company’s evidence.
We scored Samsung and Apple across 11 ethical dimensions using court filings, regulatory records, and investigative reports. Apple leads overall, but both companies carry documented integrity risks that investors should understand.
Temu owner PDD Holdings currently scores -50 on ethical sourcing. Examine the forced-labour, product-safety and privacy evidence behind its record.
Your smartphone passed through dozens of countries before it reached your pocket. We scored the companies behind it on supply chain ethics using court filings, labour investigations, and regulatory data. Only one scored positive.
We scored 10 publicly traded fashion companies on worker rights and ethical sourcing using court filings, labour investigations, and NGO reports. Most scored negative.
Adidas leads Nike in seven scored categories, with three ties. Compare worker rights, ethical sourcing and sustainability, including where both fall short.
We scored Amazon and Walmart across 11 ethical dimensions using court filings, regulatory records, and investigative reports. Two retail giants, two very different risk profiles.
The Evidence Brief