A phone’s EU energy label contains more than an energy-efficiency letter. It also provides information about battery endurance, durability and repairability. Reading those fields separately can reveal trade-offs that a single “green phone” claim hides.
The label is a product comparison tool. It is not a rating of the manufacturer’s labour practices, privacy record or overall ethics.
What the symbols mean
The European Commission’s consumer guide to smartphone and tablet labels describes the scheme introduced in June 2025.
| Label field | The question it helps answer |
|---|---|
| Energy-efficiency class | How efficient is the model under the scheme’s test method? |
| Battery endurance per charge | How long does the tested device run between charges? |
| Battery lifetime | How durable is the battery across charging cycles under the test conditions? |
| Repeated free-fall reliability | How does the model perform in the specified drop testing? |
| Repairability class | How repairable is it under the scheme’s criteria? |
| Ingress protection | What protection against dust and water is declared? |
| QR code | Where can you find the model’s registered information? |
Battery endurance and battery lifetime are not interchangeable. One concerns time between charges; the other concerns deterioration over repeated use.
Check the model in EPREL
The Commission operates EPREL, the European Product Registry for Energy Labelling. Its consumer instructions explain how to select a product group, search and open model details.
Use the label’s QR code or search the registry, then match the model identifier with the phone being sold. A familiar marketing name is less precise than the exact registered model. Save the product information alongside the retailer’s listing if the purchase matters to you.
How to compare two phones without collapsing the differences
Imagine one model with longer battery endurance but a worse repairability class, and another with easier repairs but shorter endurance. The label does not make the decision for you.
If access to charging is your main problem, endurance may matter most. If you intend to replace a battery and keep the phone for years, investigate the repair options and prices. These are hypothetical trade-offs, not claims about any particular model.
A good comparison records each dimension rather than giving both phones an invented overall environmental score.
What the label cannot settle
Test results do not promise your exact daily battery life or that a device will survive every fall. Real use varies. A repairability class also needs a practical follow-up: can you obtain the relevant service or part in your country at an acceptable cost?
The label does not establish that the company has no supply-chain or privacy concerns. For those questions, use separate evidence such as Apple’s company score, Samsung’s company score or Alphabet’s company score.
A useful shopping note
For each shortlisted phone, record its exact model, label classes, stated support end date, battery-replacement route and total price. That combines comparable product information with the practical limits that affect useful life.
Our smartphone supply-chain article covers another part of the decision. Neither that corporate research nor the energy label should be stretched into answering questions outside its scope.
Sources checked on 24 September 2026. Ownership and policies can change after this review.
Keep reading
Browse all research →How Much Water Does an AI Prompt Use? Why Estimates Differ
November 2, 2026Fairphone or a Refurbished Phone: Which Choice Makes Sense?
September 27, 2026Phone Software Support: Count Years Left, Not Years Advertised
October 19, 2026Buying a Refurbished Phone: Seven Checks Beyond the Grade
October 15, 2026Keep asking better questions about companies.
Get one useful company story each week: ownership explainers, comparisons and new findings, with the sources. The Evidence Brief is free.