Dettol, Lysol, Durex, Finish and Gaviscon are part of Reckitt’s core brand portfolio. But an old list of everything Reckitt once owned can mislead: the group completed the divestment of its Essential Home business in December 2025 while retaining a minority financial interest.
For shoppers, the important distinction is between a currently controlled brand, a sold business, and a retained investment.
Reckitt’s 11 core brands
The company’s current brand page groups its 11 “Powerbrands” into four categories:
| Category | Brands |
|---|---|
| Self care | Strepsils, Mucinex, Gaviscon, Nurofen |
| Germ protection | Lysol, Dettol, Harpic |
| Household care | Finish, Vanish |
| Intimate wellness | Durex, Veet |
This is the company’s core-brand list, not a claim to enumerate every local trademark or business interest. Reckitt’s portfolio strategy announcement separately discusses other brands and business units.
What changed with Essential Home?
Reckitt’s deal-completion notice states that the Essential Home divestment to Advent completed on 31 December 2025. Reckitt retained a 30% equity stake in the acquisition vehicle.
Those facts support a more precise statement than either “nothing changed” or “Reckitt has no connection anymore.” Control of the sold business and a remaining minority investment are different relationships.
The body of the completion announcement gives the transaction date; that matters more than relying on a search snippet or an older page label. For a specific former brand, check the buyer’s current portfolio and the local product’s legal information as well.
Why this matters for a shopping exclusion
Imagine two personal rules. One excludes only brands controlled by a company. Another excludes any brand in which that company still has a financial interest. A divestment with a retained stake can lead to different decisions under those rules.
The evidence should describe the relationship accurately so that you can apply your own rule. It should not silently choose the broadest or narrowest definition of “owned by.”
Likewise, ownership does not make household cleaners, medicines and personal-care products interchangeable. This guide maps businesses; it does not advise replacing a treatment or make claims about a product’s clinical performance.
How to verify a product outside the core list
Start with the exact product name and country. Check Reckitt’s current portfolio, then look for a completed transaction involving the brand or its business unit. An announcement that a sale is planned is not evidence that it has closed.
If the brand has moved, record the completion date and any disclosed retained interest. That makes your note usable later, when a search result still repeats the old owner.
Where ethical assessment begins
A brand list tells you which corporate reporting to investigate. It does not establish whether a cleaner’s environmental claim is accurate or whether a supplier treats workers fairly. Those require evidence about the relevant product, operation or policy.
For another household-products map, see brands owned by Procter & Gamble. Our P&G–Colgate comparison illustrates the separate task of comparing company conduct.
Check the parent company’s record
Read Reckitt’s Mashinii score for the parent company’s evidence and value-by-value assessment. This is a company score, not a separate rating for each brand or product listed above.
Sources checked on 24 September 2026. Ownership and policies can change after this review.
Keep reading
Browse all research →Look beyond the label.
Get one useful company story each week: ownership explainers, comparisons and new findings, with the sources. The Evidence Brief is free.