P&G vs Colgate: Which Is More Ethical? (2026 Household Brands)

Procter & Gamble vs Colgate: Household Brands, Opposite Ethics

You probably have products from both companies in your bathroom right now. Tide and Crest from P&G. Colgate toothpaste and Palmolive soap from Colgate-Palmolive.

On ethics, they diverge more than you would expect.

---

The Comparison

---

P&G's Surprise: Weapons

P&G's worst score is -50 on No War, No Weapons. A soap company scoring -50 on weapons is not intuitive. The score reflects P&G's industrial chemicals division and documented supply relationships with military contractors. P&G's portfolio includes industrial cleaning and chemical products that serve government and defence applications.

On the positive side, P&G scores +20 on Honest & Fair Business and +10 on Planet-Friendly Business, reflecting stronger corporate governance and more credible environmental programs.

---

Colgate's Problem: Animals and Climate

Colgate scores -40 on both Kind to Animals and Planet-Friendly Business. The animal welfare score reflects documented animal testing practices. Colgate-Palmolive has been flagged by animal welfare organisations for ongoing testing in markets where it is not legally required.

The -30 on Respect for Cultures & Communities and -30 on Fair Trade & Ethical Sourcing add supply chain concerns, particularly around palm oil sourcing and community impact in sourcing regions.

---

Different Failures

P&G is better overall but carries a weapons score that no consumer would expect. Colgate is worse overall and fails hardest on animal welfare -- awkward for a company whose products go in your mouth.

Same bathroom shelf. Different ethical footprint.

Compare P&G and Colgate on Mashinii.