MASHINIi

“My client asked what their money is funding. I didn't have a good answer.”

Now you can. We built a system that reads what companies can't edit — court filings, regulatory actions, investigative journalism — and turns it into 11 separate scores per company. With citations your client can check themselves.

Built by a team from Goldman Sachs, Deutsche Bank, and Arthur D. Little. 6,000+ companies scored.
Free · No account required · Results in 30 seconds
Try a Free Portfolio AuditSearch Any Company

ESG labels won't survive a follow-up question.

A client asks: “Is my sustainable fund actually sustainable?” You point to the ESG label. Then they check the holdings. Here's what they'll find.

Schlumberger: MSCI AA "Leader"

MSCI rates it AA and includes it in its own screened energy index. Ukraine designated it a war sponsor. We scored it -90 on No War, No Weapons. If this is in your client's "ethical" fund, they'll find out eventually. Better they hear it from you.

Read the full analysis

65% of ESG ETF holdings score negative

We scored the 26 most common holdings across popular ESG ETFs. 17 of 26 had negative average scores. The label says sustainable. The court filings say otherwise.

See the full scorecard

Microsoft: MSCI AAA. Weapons score: -60.

The highest possible ESG grade. Also a major defence contractor. A single letter hides both facts. We show 11 separate scores — so your client sees what actually matters to them.

See Microsoft's breakdown

This is what the independent record shows. Here's how you use it.

Tuesday morning. A client meeting.

Your client brings in a printout of their pension holdings. They've seen something in the news about one of the companies. They want to know if their money is clean.

You open their portfolio audit on Mashinii. In 30 seconds, every holding is scored across 11 dimensions. You show them:

“Apple scores +9.5 overall. But on worker rights, it's -30 — that's the Foxconn supply chain issues. Here's the specific court filing.”

“Microsoft scores +5.5 overall. But on weapons, it's -60. Here's the defence contract documentation.”

“Here are the seven companies in your portfolio that align with what you care about. Here are the three that don't. And here's exactly why, with sources you can read yourself.”

Your client doesn't need to trust a rating. They can read the evidence. And you're the advisor who showed it to them.

The conversations that win — or lose — clients

Before and after independent data.

Is my pension funding things I disagree with?

Without independent data

I'd need to check, but most diversified funds hold a broad range of companies...

With Mashinii

I've audited your holdings. Three companies are flagged — here's the evidence for each. And here are your options for addressing them.

Are ESG funds actually ethical?

Without independent data

The fund has strong ESG credentials and a good track record...

With Mashinii

Let me show you what's actually inside this fund. 65% of the holdings in popular ESG ETFs score negatively against court filings. Here's how yours compares.

Can you show me proof, not just a rating?

Without independent data

The fund provider has a rigorous screening process that considers multiple factors...

With Mashinii

Every score links to the original source — the court filing, the regulatory action, the investigation. You can read it yourself. Here, let me show you.

Read the full guide: 5 Questions Every Client Will Ask →

From client question to cited answer in 30 seconds

01

Upload any portfolio

CSV, Excel, PDF, or even a brokerage screenshot. Our system extracts every holding automatically. Handles Hargreaves Lansdown, AJ Bell, St. James's Place, Interactive Brokers, and most major platforms.

02

See the full picture

Every holding scored across 11 ethical dimensions. Which companies are flagged. Which align. With the specific court filings, regulatory actions, and investigative reports behind each score.

03

Share with your client

Export a branded PDF report, share a live link, or download a CSV. Every claim cited. Every source verifiable. Data your client can check themselves.

The maths is simple

The average UK financial advisor manages £30M in client assets. Losing one client with £500K AUM costs roughly £5,000/year in management fees — every year.

A Professional plan costs £49/month. If this tool helps you keep one client — or win one new one — it pays for itself for years.

And the first audit is free.

Audit a portfolio now — free

Plans built for advisory practices

Free

£0

Search any company — all 11 dimensions, full citations

1 sample portfolio audit (20 holdings)

No account required

Start searching →

Professional

£49/mo

Unlimited portfolio audits (100 holdings each)

Full company-level breakdowns

CSV export for your CRM

Licensed for client presentations

Less than one hour of your billing rate.

See full pricing →

Business

£199/mo

Everything in Professional

Branded PDF client reports

API access (2,000 requests/day)

Bulk CSV upload for multiple portfolios

Onboarding call + priority support

One retained client pays for years of this.

See full pricing →

Where the scores come from

Court filings

SEC, federal, state — public record with docket numbers

Investigative journalism

Financial Times, Reuters, WSJ — verified reporting only

NGO reports

Amnesty, HRW, Greenpeace — cited with page numbers

Regulatory actions

EPA, FTC, ICO — official enforcement records

Read our full methodology →

Your next client conversation is coming. Be ready.

Run a free portfolio audit with real client holdings. See what the independent data shows. No account required.

Audit a Portfolio — FreeSee Plans