Better Health for All

U.S. Global Investors, Inc. is an investment management firm.

Its core business activities, such as managing mutual funds and investment strategies, do not directly involve health-related products, services, or research. Therefore, the company's products and services have no significant positive or negative health impact, and it generates no revenue from products with direct health harms. Its operations do not have direct safety implications for physical or mental health, nor does it offer health-related products requiring accessibility considerations. The business model does not involve serving vulnerable populations with health needs, and its products do not carry health risks requiring disclosure. The company's R&D is not focused on health outcomes, and its operations do not generate significant health externalities. There is no evidence of specific health equity programs, healthcare workforce support initiatives, preventative health measures, healthcare data management, global health crisis response actions, mental health initiatives, pharmaceutical patents, food products, health education, addiction potential in products, or clinical trials conducted by U.S. Global Investors, Inc. The provided articles discuss general socially responsible funds or broad health equity initiatives by government bodies, but offer no specific data for U.S. Global Investors, Inc. on any of the health-related KPIs. , , , , ,

No War, No Weapons

No specific, factual evidence pertaining to GROW.US (U.S. Global Investors, Inc.) and the 'No War, No Weapons' ethical value was found in the provided articles. The articles discuss general ESG risks in the defense sector

, investor approaches to weapons exclusions , or the conflict minerals compliance of a different entity (USI Global) , none of which directly provide data for GROW.US's performance against the specified KPIs.

Respect for Cultures & Communities

No specific data was found regarding U.S. Global Investors, Inc.'s formal partnerships with indigenous or local community groups, revenue reinvestment in local communities, cultural appropriation incidents, cultural impact assessments, local employment ratios, grievance mechanisms, complaint resolution times, FPIC participation rates, community governance inclusion, cultural preservation investments, local procurement, indigenous supplier counts, cultural site protection, social license to operate, charitable giving, community fund allocation, language inclusivity, cultural incident response, or cultural training completion.

The provided articles primarily discuss financial performance, general sustainable investing trends, or the ESG profile of a specific fund managed by the company, rather than the company's direct actions or policies related to Respect for Cultures & Communities.